User Generated Education

Education as it should be – passion-based.

Posts Tagged ‘trends

The Over Promotion of Failure

leave a comment »

2017-04-30_1410

Almost daily I see posts on social media by educators promoting the benefits of failure. It often seems that there is a push to intentional embed failure into instructional activities. This always rubs me the wrong way. Failure has almost universal negative connotations. It doesn’t feel good and sometimes it is extremely difficult, if impossible, to recover from big failures.

For the past several years we’ve been bombarded with advice about the “wisdom of failure.” Books by business giants and self-help gurus tout the importance of learning from mistakes. The problem with the focus on failure is that failure is a weak process when put up directly against its counterpart: success.

I want to be clear that I’m not against learning from failure. It’s certainly useful that humans have the rare biological luxury of being able to learn, non-lethally, from our failures — we can remember them, share stories about them, even laugh about them. And all the stories and lessons about what you can learn from failure represent real opportunities to do better. The problem is that none of the advice and literature on failure fairly compares learning from failure to learning from success.

We have to ask how abundant or common are useful failures compared to useful successes? If opportunities for learning are rare, it’s hard to make a practice out of them. Unfortunately, truly useful failures that change our thinking (as opposed to merely stupid failures that just confirm what we already should have known) are relatively rare. (http://www.businessinsider.com/we-learn-more-from-success-than-failure-2014-6)

Focusing on success in practice does not translate in attempting to craft learning experiences into ones whereby learners have no struggles; achieve success or desired results on first attempts and iterations. In fact, I believe that authentic learning experiences should require multiple iterations prior to their successfully completion. This mimics real life learning.

The expectation then becomes that learners will struggle with their tasks, that they will focus from what went right and build upon these elements to have increasingly successful iterations within their process of learning the given task. I reframe the idea of failure, that oftentimes occur within open-ended, ill-defined projects, as things didn’t go as originally planned. It is just a part of the learning process. I explain to my learners that they will experience setbacks, mistakes, struggles. It is just a natural part of real world learning. Struggles, setbacks, and mistakes are not discussed as failure but as parts of a process that need improving. The focus becomes on what went right and on how learners can increase those aspects that were successful. The underlying learning principle becomes success breeds more success.

Learning from success is an active process that needs to become part of an organization’s culture. You just need to ensure that at least some of your “after action” reporting is dedicated to what went right. Even an event that was largely a failure probably has some small successes that need to be shared. (http://www.businessinsider.com/we-learn-more-from-success-than-failure-2014-6)

Within this framework, learners then reflect on their learning experiences coming from a place of success with questions such as:

  • What specific actions did you take that were successful within your learning task?
  • What did you do to decrease your liabilities during your learning task?
  • What personal and social resources did you draw upon if and when you reached an impasse with your learning task?
  • What strategies did you use to self-regulate your setbacks and frustrations if and when they occurred during  your learning task?
  • What did you see as your major strengths during the learning task?
  • What aspects of your learning will you take into future learning experiences in order to increase your chances of being successful with similar tasks?

successreflection

Written by Jackie Gerstein, Ed.D.

April 30, 2017 at 9:06 pm

Understanding the Language of the Internet Age of Education

leave a comment »

Language provides meaning to complex concepts, influences our thinking, and even affects how we behave.

Linguistic processes are pervasive in most fundamental domains of thought, unconsciously shaping us from the nuts and bolts of cognition and perception to our loftiest abstract notions and major life decisions. Language is central to our experience of being human, and the languages we speak profoundly shape the way we think, the way we see the world, the way we live our lives (Lera Boroditsky).

Based on evidence that language influences our thoughts, perceptions, and behaviors. it follows that understanding the language related to technology use in our society influences if and how educators and learners use these technologies for their own learning.

The importance of this premise has been noted by the National Council for English Teachers, who proposed what it means to be literate in the 21st Century.

Literacy has always been a collection of cultural and communicative practices shared among members of particular groups. As society and technology change, so does literacy. Because technology has increased the intensity and complexity of literate environments, the twenty-first century demands that a literate person possess a wide range of abilities and competencies, many literacies. These literacies—from reading online newspapers to participating in virtual classrooms—are multiple, dynamic, and malleable. As in the past, they are inextricably linked with particular histories, life possibilities, and social trajectories of individuals and groups (http://www.ncte.org/governance/literacies).

We tend to shy away from those things we do not understand, do not have a language for. The following is my version of a multi-modal, multimedia dictionary of those terms that are being developed and used by educators and learners in this age of learning.  The proposition is that with greater understanding and knowledge about how technology is influencing informal learning, workplace training and development, and society-at-large, the more likely educators would be more  to explore the integration of these ideas and instructional strategies into their classroom environments.

The ultimate goal is stated eloquently by Cathy Davidson:

Given the ever-increasing rapidity and magnitude of change on a global scale, we all need to master the precious and formidable skill of being able to stop in our tracks, discard the roadmap that has failed us, and try out a different route on the unpredictable journey ahead. (Davidson, 2009).

To do so requires that educators know and understand the trends that affect the world-at-large.

Please feel free to tell me of any additional trends that should be included!

Boroditsky, L. (2010).  Lost in Translation. Wall Street Journal.  Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703467304575383131592767868.html

Davidson, C. (2009).  Learning Radical Transformation.  HASTAC.  Retrieved from http://hastac.org/blogs/cathy-davidson/learning-radical-transformation.

National Council for English Teachers. (2009). The Definition of 21st Century Literacies.  Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/governance/literacies.

Written by Jackie Gerstein, Ed.D.

October 5, 2011 at 8:37 pm

%d bloggers like this: