Posts Tagged ‘learning’
UDL and The Flipped Classroom: The Full Picture
In response to all of the attention given to the flipped classroom, I proposed The Flipped Classroom: The Full Picture and The Flipped Classroom: The Full Picture for Higher Education in which the viewing of videos (often discussed on the primary focus of the flipped classroom) becomes a part of a larger cycle of learning based on an experiential cycle of learning.
Universal Design for Learning has also been in the news lately as a new report Universal Design for Learning (UDL): Initiatives on the Move was released by the National Center on UDL, May, 2012. This post describes the principles of Universal Design for Learning and how they naturally occur when a full cycle of learning, including ideas related to the flipped classroom, are used within the instructional process.
Universal Design for Learning
The UDL framework:
- includes three principles calling for educators to provide multiple means of engagement, multiple means of presenting instructional content, and multiple means of action and expression when designing and delivering instruction
- is based on the latest learning sciences, including cognitive neuroscience, human developmental science, and education research
- helps educators to use digital technology and innovative methods to teach whole classes while personalizing each student’s instruction
- provides a blueprint for creating flexible instructional goals, methods, materials and assessments that work for everyone—rather than the one-size-fits-all approaches found in typical instructional environments http://www.udlcenter.org/advocacy/state/report
Source: http://www.cast.org/udl/
More about UDL can be found at:
- CAST: Center for Applied Special Technology
- National Center on Universal Design for Learning
- UDL Learning Tools
- UDL Toolkit
Some of the key findings of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL): Initiatives on the Move study:
Both state and local district leaders:
- reported a high degree of familiarity with the UDL principles. All state leaders reported having good, very good, or excellent familiarity with the UDL principles, while more than half of the local leaders reported being extremely or moderately familiar with the UDL principles.
- linked UDL with other education initiatives that embrace universal approaches occurring in general education environments, e.g. response to intervention (RTI), positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS), and differentiated instruction.
- perceived a connection between technology and UDL.
State leaders reported:
- strong connection between UDL and standards-based education initiatives, e.g. the Common Core State Standards and statewide assessments.
- UDL was addressed as part of their state technology plans or in the context of 21st century learning.
- critical to UDL advocacy:two factors are critical to UDL advocacy: (1) state leadership need to embrace UDL and (2) UDL must be understood as a general education initiative that moves beyond special education.
UDL, the Flipped Classroom, and Experiential Learning
As I stated in my introduction, I proposed an experiential flipped classroom learning model in response to all of the attention being given to the flipped classroom. I think it is a great opportunity to change the predominant didactic model of education that is especially prevalent in upper elementary through graduate school education.This model has experiential learning at the core of the learning process with the content videos supporting the learning rather than being the core or primary instructional piece.
Simply put, experiential learning is learning from experience. Experiential learning can be a highly effective educational method. It engages the learner at a more personal level by addressing the needs and wants of the individual. For experiential learning to be truly effective, it should employ the whole learning wheel, from goal setting, to experimenting and observing, to reviewing, and finally action planning. This complete process allows one to learn new skills, new attitudes or even entirely new ways of thinking. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experiential_learning)
UDL is a strategy, a process that provides opportunities for all students, not just those with special needs (but I believe all learners have special needs), to be successful learners. This is the same goal for the flipped classroom model designed as an experiential learning cycle.
UDL and The Flipped Classroom: The Full Picture
What follows is how an experiential flipped classroom learning model, that includes elements of the flipped classroom, fits the principles of UDL. Explanations are provided about how the principles of UDL are naturally and seamlessly addressed in this model.
Experiential Engagement
The primary UDL principle addressed during this phase is Provide Multiple Means for Engagement. The goal of this phase, in line with the tenets of experiential learning, is to hook or motivate the student by engaging him or her on a personal level.
By introducing learners to the lesson topic and content through sensory-rich, highly-engaging, hands-on, and authentic learning activities, the following key guidelines of this principle are addressed:
- Provide tasks that allow for active participation, exploration and experimentation
- Design activities so that learning outcomes are authentic, communicate to real audiences, and reflect a purpose that is clear to the participants
- Invite personal response, evaluation and self-reflection to content and activities
- Include activities that foster the use of imagination to solve novel and relevant problems, or make sense of complex ideas in creative ways
- Create cooperative learning groups with clear goals, roles, and responsibilities – many of these activities require cooperative learning. (http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines/principle3)
Concept Development: The What
The primary UDL principle addressed in this phase is Provide Multiple Means of Representation. This is the phase where videos, as proposed by the flipped classroom, are utilized to assist students in learning the theoretical concepts related to the content being covered. As previously noted, though, the videos are used to support, introduce, and reinforce the theoretical content as opposed as being at its core. Videos should not be the only source of concept formation. To support learning, a multimedia learning environment needs to provide multiple, flexible methods of presentation. Ways of addressing this principle include presenting material in a variety of formats (http://www.cited.org/index.aspx?page_id=147). Interactive websites and ebooks, simulations, and content-rich websites can also service this purpose. The learner should be offered a menu of resources to study and learn about the topic.
The following guidelines of Provide Multiple Means of Representation are addressed if learning is approached in this manner:
- Present key concepts in one form of symbolic representation (e.g., an expository text or a math equation) with an alternative form (e.g., an illustration, dance/movement, diagram, table, model, video, comic strip, storyboard, photograph, animation, physical or virtual manipulative)
- Provide visual diagrams, charts, notations of music or sound to support auditory content and information.
- Provide descriptions (text or spoken) for all images, graphics, video, or animations
- Provide interactive models that guide exploration and new understandings
- Provide multiple entry points to a lesson and optional pathways through content (e.g., exploring big ideas through dramatic works, arts and literature, film and media)
Meaning Making: The So What
The primary UDL principle addressed during this phase is Provide Multiple Means of Action and Expression. Learners, during this phase, construct their own meanings and understanding of the experiences, content, and topics covered in the previous phases. They do so via blogs, vodcasts, podcasts, Voicethread, Edmodo, wikis, and other web 2.0 tools that allows for personal reflection and expression. A digital environment supports student learning when it provides multiple, flexible methods for student action, expression, and apprenticeship (http://www.cited.org/index.aspx?page_id=147). As with content presentation, several options should be offered to the students.
The following guidelines related to Provide Multiple Means of Action and Expression are addressed when learners making meaning of the content:
- Use social media and interactive web tools (e.g., discussion forums, chats, web design, annotation tools, storyboards, comic strips, animation presentations)
- Compose in multiple media such as text, speech, drawing, illustration, comics, storyboards, design, film, music, visual art, sculpture, or video
- Use web applications (e.g., wikis, animation, presentation)
- Use story webs, outlining tools, or concept mapping tools
Also addressed are guidelines from Provide Multiple Means for Engagement:
- Provide learners with as much discretion and autonomy as possible by providing choices
- Vary activities and sources of information so that they can be personalized and contextualized to learners’ lives
- Design activities so that learning outcomes are authentic, communicate to real audiences, and reflect a purpose that is clear to the participants
- Invite personal response, evaluation and self-reflection to content and activities
- Provide feedback that is substantive and informative rather than comparative or competitive
The Multiple Means of Representation are also reinforced during the meaning making phase as learners are asked to . . .
- Incorporate explicit opportunities for review and practice
Demonstration and Application: The Now What
During this phase, learners demonstrate what they learned during the previous phases and how this learning will transfer to other areas of their lives. The primary UDL principle addressed during this phase is Provide Multiple Means of Action and Expression
- Compose in multiple media such as text, speech, drawing, illustration, design, film, music, dance/movement, visual art, sculpture or video
Also addressed are guidelines from Provide Multiple Means for Engagement:
- Provide learners with as much discretion and autonomy as possible by providing choices
- Allow learners to participate in the design of classroom activities and academic tasks
- Vary activities and sources of information so that they can be personalized and contextualized to learners’ lives
- Design activities so that learning outcomes are authentic, communicate to real audiences, and reflect a purpose that is clear to the participants
- Provide tasks that allow for active participation, exploration and experimentation
- Include activities that foster the use of imagination to solve novel and relevant problems, or make sense of complex ideas in creative ways
- Vary the degrees of freedom for acceptable performance
The Multiple Means of Representation are also reinforced during this demonstration and application phase as learners . . .
- Provide explicit, supported opportunities to generalize learning to new situations
- Offer opportunities over time to revisit key ideas and linkages between ideas
UDL Photo Images from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl
Is There a Digital Divide or an Intellectual-Pedagogical One?
This post includes a number of wonderings . . .
For the past few days, there has been some controversy over a TED talk that included some commentary about classism. See the Time article Was Nick Hanauer’s TED Talk on Income Inequality Too Rich for Rich People? for a synopsis. The basic premise was that the talk was censored from public viewing due to it being offensive to the wealthy folks that pay to attend the TED conference.
I really love watching TED talks but this controversy got me thinking about intellectual elitism. I cannot nor will ever be able to afford to go to a TED conference but I can watch them online. I often ask, in group settings, if folks heard of TED. Groups that contain higher education faculty and teachers, who are engaged in social networks, do know of TED talks. My college students and friends, many who are of lower SES levels, have not.
I wonder what would happen if I were to ask this question of the larger population. I believe the results would show that more higher income folks would know about the TED talks than lower income folks.
I have the privilege of using my laptop, iPhone, and iPad to learn about anything I want throughout the day. These devices along with skills I gained about how to learn have provided me with opportunities to access information I desire. I am wondering if folks from lower income brackets can say the same.
The use of technology use by our society has sparked discussion about the digital divide.
Such numbers may seem proof that America is, indeed, online. But they mask an emerging division, one that has worrisome implications for our economy and society. Increasingly, we are a country in which only the urban and suburban well-off have truly high-speed Internet access, while the rest — the poor and the working class — either cannot afford access or use restricted wireless access as their only connection to the Internet. As our jobs, entertainment, politics and even health care move online, millions are at risk of being left behind.
- But I wonder if the digital divide is really an intellectual or pedagogical one.
- I wonder that if a comparison was done of higher and lower income schools, what would be the ratio of 1:1 (one mobile device per student during school time) initiatives?
- I wonder, for those lower income schools, how many students have computer devices at home that match those they are using in school.
- Even considering the new Ted-Ed Lessons Worth Sharing, I wonder which schools are using the lessons.
- I wonder if technology integration strategies are similar for higher income schools in comparison to lower income skills.
Are we sugarcoating a larger sociological issue of classism in our school systems? Thirty years ago, Jean Anyon wrote Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work
It’s no surprise that schools in wealthy communities are better than those in poor communities, or that they better prepare their students for desirable jobs. It may be shocking, however, to learn how vast the differences in schools are – not so much in resources as in teaching methods and philosophies of education.
I fear that the digital divide is really an intellectual and pedagogical one and that it is being perpetuated in our educational system by the use or lack thereof of the technologies that are influencing and driving our society-at-large.
Image Attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/vaxzine/2278300537/
Nurturing a Learner’s Sense of Wonder
I started my work in education as an outdoor educator. I took elementary-aged kids on environmental education adventures and at-risk youth on extended wilderness trips. When taking the at-risk students on backpacking trips in Maine, some of my favorite moments came when we came over a knoll to an outlook that appeared to have a view of the whole state of Maine. Due to numerous trips to this location, I knew what was coming after our long day hiking through the dense woods. The kids did not. I would rush ahead so I could see their faces as they approached this magnificent view. It never failed. I watched their faces turn from the look related to the strenuous climb to that of pure joy and amazement at the view. These “too-cool” teens’ lit-up faces and cries of “wow’ reminded me of the same reactions I saw in the younger kids as they explored the nature world during our hikes.
A sense of wonder is characterized by full engagement, flow, being present in the moment, and a high “wow” factor. Rachel Carson stated in A Sense of Wonder:
A child’s world is fresh and new and beautiful, full of wonder and excitement. It is our misfortune that for most of us that clear-eyed vision, that true instinct for what is beautiful and awe-inspiring, is dimmed and even lost before we reach adulthood. If I had influence with the good fairy who is supposed to preside over the christening of all children I should ask that her gift to each child in the world be a sense of wonder so indestructible that it would last throughout life, as an unfailing antidote against the boredom and disenchantments of later years, the sterile preoccupation with things that are artificial, the alienation from the sources of our strength.
I am proposing, then, that a primary role of the educator – of all ages – is to tap into, nurture, nourish, and celebrate each learner’s sense of wonder.
Our job as educators is to create space in our classrooms and our day for this wonder. We need to let them know that their questions are not only valued an important but have a place in our classrooms and school (Building a Culture of Wonder: Inquiry in Primary Education).
Specific Examples of Bringing a Sense of Wonder Into the Classroom
What follows are a few activities to learn about students’ areas of wonder. Included are both hands-on and technology-enhanced learning activities.
Four Quad Poster
Learners are asked to paint a piece of plywood, cut about 12″ x 12″, that addresses the following.
This activity has been used with Kindergarten through Master’s degree students. Painting was chosen as the medium to activate a different frame of mind (part of the brain) for answering these questions – possibly tapping into thoughts, areas, creative parts of themselves that they may not with more common medium. After completion, their quad plaques were hug in the classroom. Each student explained his/her creation and fielded questions by other students.
1st Grader, Jeff, Wonders About Sunsets
5th Grader, Marc, Wonders About Girls (of course)
A huge benefit of this activity is that it provided me, the educator, with a huge amount of assessment information. I got to learn about the passions of my students and very quickly got to know each one as a unique individual.
Five Word Memoirs: What Do You Wonder About
The 3rd through 5th grade students were given the following directions:
First, they created artistic versions of what they wondered about:
Then, they converted these into technology-based expressions:
With PicLits
. . . and with Imagechef
WonderPoints: Using Mobile Devices to Activate a Sense of Wonder
Bernie Dodge, of Webquest fame, is exploring ways to incorporate mobile learning into the classroom. He is developing WonderPoints as a way to use mobile devices to explore personal points of wonder. WonderPoints, involves studying a small area outside the classroom from multiple points of view. As they note things they wonder about, they take pictures, record sounds and capture the beginnings of a question that is then geotagged.
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed. Albert Einstein
Additional Readings
I did an extensive search of the internet to find additional references and resources for creating a sense of wonder and a culture of curiosity in the classroom. Sadly, I found only a few:
- Edutopia’s A Sense of Wonder: Creating and Maintaining Interest in Education
- @Saskateach’s Building a Culture of Wonder: Inquiry in Primary Education
- Related: Tinkering School
Imagine That: A School of Possibilities
One of my favorite Bloggers, Maria Popova aka Brainpickers, shared a project called Museum of Possibilities http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2011/02/03/the-museum-of-possibilities/
To prevent this disconnect when inaugurating its Quartier des Spectacles, the city of Montréal came up with an exceptionally inspired solution: The Museum of Possibilities — a wonderful daylong pop-up installation inviting visitors to share their dreams and visions for the future of the space by jotting down their ideas on pieces of paper and attaching them to colorful balloons.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kelseysnook/5049569491/sizes/z/in/set-72157624459314436/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kelseysnook/4777855005/sizes/z/in/set-72157624459314436/
Others could then vote on the ideas with stickers, collectively choosing the best visions for their shared space.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kelseysnook/4778484200/sizes/z/in/set-72157624459314436/
I immediately thought, “Wow, what a great idea for visioning the future of an individual school or school district.” Ever since I heard about how the Chucagh School District revamped their educational system, I have been intrigued by the idea of having the local communities develop their own educational systems and curriculum in a way that meets their community and student needs.
Chugach School District in south central Alaska transformed their district from a failure to a success by engaging the community, asking fundamental questions, and using real data to understand where resources needed to go. In 1994, the district was failing by almost all measures: staff turnover exceeded 50%; students scored lowest in the state of Alaska on California Achievement Tests; business leaders complained that graduates lacked basic skills; and only one student in 26 years had gone on to college. Through a series of town hall meetings, the district determined that the traditional industrial model of education to prepare students for college was not relevant to their community. The school board and district leaders proposed radical changes to suit the remote community’s needs. In 2001, the district was the smallest organization ever to receive the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Awards for performance excellence in education.
http://www.cosn.org/Initiatives/3DDataDrivenDecisionMaking/3DCaseStudies/3DCaseStudyChugachSchoolDistrict/tabid/5701/Default.aspx
An event such as The Museum of Possibilities or in this case, The School of Possibilities, could kick off a visioning of a new school (newly formed or older one serious about school reform) – one driven by all stakeholders –> school personnel, students, parents, local business, and other interested community members. This event would work only if the school “officials” were willing to seriously consider all ideas, to begin or re-organize the school basically from scratch driven by the ideas generated at this and follow-up events.
Some of the key steps for this event would include:
- An invitation or call out for anyone and everyone interested in developing the school environment, curriculum, and instructional practices is sent out via all types of social media outlets.
- It is planned as a celebration of learning with the planners locating an outdoor venue to set up the balloons, and arrange for some live music, possibly dance, and some food.
- During the event, everyone, all ages, are encouraged to jot down and post their ideas on the balloons, and vote for their favorites. Those who have difficulty reading and writing for any reason are be given assistance.
- The results are published via paper and online sources, and widely disseminated with a further request for feedback.
Guidelines would need to include:
- Understand and embrace crowdsourcing as a viable or even required method for visioning the future of the school.
- Enter with and accept the ideas of others with an open mind, attitude, and heart.
- Let go of expectations what the outcomes might be.
- Be willing to entertain and implement any popular ideas.
What are the underlying messages that such an event would give?
- Visioning the future of the school is a celebration – something that should be embraced and enjoyed.
- The power for the school and its curriculum is under local control.
- All stakeholders and interested people’ are important.
- It really does take a community to educate a child and that the community is invited and encouraged to do so.
This would only be a start – but what a great way to jump start authentic and engaging educational change for that school community.
Flow – A Measure of Student Engagement
When I first heard about Czikszentmihalyi’s “Flow” concept and research, I became quite intrigued with this research. Its face validity immediately resonated with me. I always cherished those times in my own life when I was so fully engaged that I had no other thoughts than the task at hand, with joy coming purely from the engagement. I never had a name for it but Czikszentmihalyi did and conducted research on it.
The characteristics of “Flow” according to Czikszentmihalyi are:
- Completely involved, focused, concentrating – with this either due to innate curiosity or as the result of training
- Sense of ecstasy – of being outside everyday reality
- Great inner clarity – knowing what needs to be done and how well it is going
- Knowing the activity is doable – that the skills are adequate, and neither anxious or bored
- Sense of serenity
- Timeliness – thoroughly focused on present, don’t notice time passing
- Intrinsic motivation – whatever produces “flow” becomes its own reward
(http://austega.com/gifted/16-gifted/articles/24-flow-and-mihaly-csikszentmihalyi.html)
Here is a TED talk from Czikszentmihalyi:
Using Flow As a Measure of Student Engagement
The Canadian Education Association’s (CEA) released a report What did you do in school today? – a three-year research and development initiative designed to assess, and mobilize new ideas for enhancing the learning experiences of students. Intellectual challenge was measured by Csikszentmilhalyi’s theory of flow. (Source for the following http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/sorting-students-learning)
A new measure – instructional challenge – developed from Csikszentmilhalyi’s theory of flow, offers insights into students’ experiences of learning. First year results revealed generally low levels of student engagement. While almost 70 percent of the 32,322 students reported positive experiences of social and institutional engagement, only 37 percent felt intellectually engaged in learning. Less than half (between 42 and 47 percent) of middle and secondary students experience flow in their math and language arts classes.
In the past it was often assumed that disengaged students were easy to identify: they were the young people at the back of the class, the ones making their way to shop or special classes, or those lingering down the street well after the bell had rung. Data from What did you do in school today? suggest that disengagement is not – and may never have been – limited to small groups of students or as visible as we once thought. Over half of the students in our sample (n=32,300) – many of whom go to class each day, complete their work on time, and can demonstrate that they are meeting expected learning outcomes – are experiencing low levels of intellectual engagement.
According to the report, the implications for educating youth include:
Students differ in their aspirations, interests, and aptitudes. But it is worth considering how distinct pathways, trajectories, or streams that too often limit opportunities for students could become permeable spaces for learning. What if the curriculum anchors their learning, but ceases to anchor the students themselves because its aim is the development of important competencies through diverse learning experiences that value and extend young peoples’ knowledge, interests, and capacities across all curriculum domains?
In the context of the still emerging 21st century learning agenda, the concept of intellectual engagement provides a way into considering the kinds of learning experiences young people require to develop important competencies for learning and life. If we aspire to create learning environments where all students are engaged in using and developing 21st century competencies, however, a much deeper approach may be required; one that provides for inclusive and sustained work with ideas and practices that disrupt prevailing assumptions about teaching, learning, and educational outcomes. (emphasis added).
Questions for Thought”
- Is Flow a valid measure of students’ intellectual engagement?
- Should educators focus on creating a flow state for the students in their classrooms?
- If so, what are some general strategies for creating flow within an educational setting?










































